Any creator of other entities would thus need to exist and be a part of the universe (and it would need to relate to other entities in some manner, as a human creator relates to the entity, brick, when he constructs the new entity, building. The problem of evil refers to the challenge of reconciling belief in an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent god, with the existence of evil and suffering in the world    [note 1] the problem may be described either experientially or theoretically [2. Problem of evil which deals with the logical compatibility of god with the existence of evil has been mostly resolved since alvin plantinga's free will defense , the evidential problem of evil which has to do with the ubiquitousness of horrendous evil as probable evidence against god's. I don't care if you believe in god, i just want to know what you think the best argument you've heard against his existence for the sake of this question, assume that god is: 1.
Demonstrate that by logical deduction the existence of god is not possible since evil exists, whereas the second seeks to show that the probability of god's existence in the face of evil is increasingly low the more one considers the evidence. Update: i want arguments against the existence of god saying there is no evidence for god, if that's true, at best leaves us with god possibly existing without our knowledge saying there is no evidence for god, if that's true, at best leaves us with god possibly existing without our knowledge. For centuries, atheists argued that (an all-loving, all-powerful) god is logically incompatible with the existence of evil, and thus the existence of evil provided a knock-down argument against god the standard form of this argument was provided by jl mackie in evil and omnipotence (1955. The most weighty of the arguments against god's existence is the problem of evil of all the atheistic arguments, this is the one that has been around for longest, that has had the most words written about it, and that draws the most diverse responses from christians.
Unlike the logical argument from evil, which holds that the existence of god (so defined) is logically incompatible with some known fact about evil, the evidential (or probabilistic) argument from evil contends that some known fact about evil is evidence against the existence of god. Evil and omnipotence by j l mackie university of sydney the traditional arguments for the existence of god have been fairly thoroughly criticised by philosophers. The existence of god is logically incompatible with the existence of evil, if an only if god has no morally sufficient reason for permitting the existence of evil 2) none of the reasons proposed by theists as to god's morally sufficient reason for permitting evil to exist is in fact a morally sufficient reason. The problem of evil arises from the paradox of an omnibenevolent, omnipotent deity's allowing the existence of evil (pojman 1987: 151) the judeo-christian tradition affirmed that god is omnipotent, omniscient and perfectly good. - the problem of evil is very simple: why would evil exist if there were an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent and all perfect god evil has been a major obstacle for those who hold tough faith in a higher being.
The evidential version of the problem of evil (also referred to as the probabilistic or inductive version), seeks to show that the existence of evil, although logically consistent with the existence of god, counts against or lowers the probability of the truth of theism. Chapters 7 to 12 deal with traditional arguments for the existence of god, such as the cosmological and teleological arguments, as well as defenses against the traditional arguments from evil and god's hiddenness. Mackie was wrong: the existence of god and the existence of evil aren't mutually exclusive let's look at the three attributes of god that mackie named omnipotence: as we noted in the prior answer, omnipotence doesn't mean the ability to do what is logically impossible.
Evil and omnipotence (j l mackie) 2 (alexander pope's essay on man, epistle i, line 289) it is hard to deny the existence of evil, despite what pope says (and however elegantly he says it. Of evil, which purports to show the inconsistency between the existence of an omniperfect being and the fact that there is evil in the actual world (mackie 1982) (ii) the problem of divine hiddenness, which purports to show the inconsistency between. Omnipotence and omniscience do if god is omniscient, he cannot possibly be omnipotent, because he would have no power to make decisions, but be a slave to an eternal script, which would be his god fortunately, scripture only says god is omnipotent.
The problem of evil is often posed to theists who believe that god possesses the three qualities stated in the title: omnipotence, omniscience and omnibenevolence. When arguing against the existence of god, one might be presented with attempts to use his divine attributes of omnipotence (all powerful), omniscience (all knowing) and omnibenevolence (all good) against him. The traditional monotheistic conception of god requires omnipotence, omnibenevolence, and omniscience if god were omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, then evil would not exist the concept of the god of classical theism is incoherent because within the attributes of god contradict each other and they also contradict our experience of. It is often held to be impossible, or at least improbable, for a deity to exhibit such property alongside omniscience and omnipotence as a result of the problem of evil however, some philosophers, such as alvin plantinga, argue the plausibility of co-existence.