The government should not control what children eat essay 1841 words 8 pages childhood obesity is an epidemic in the united states, nearly twenty percent of children between the ages of 6 and 11 are clinically obese however the government has no place trying to control this. We believe that if the government were to control our diets it would be a violation against our freedom it isn't fair to be told what to eat, but we have pros and cons on this situation pros 1 it would stop fatal diseases 2 we would live longer 3 our country would be healthier 4 it would. Government should stay out of health care and eating decisions that their citizens engage in, as previous governmental experiences indicate that once in control of something, the government does not usually do a good job.
We have a food system and a marketing environment that are created and designed for us to eat more, not less, nestle, who blurbed cohen's book, tells the post. The fact is that in our country, any government intrusion looks undesirable we are so used to making free choice and to having access to everything we need and want that we have already forgotten the value and usefulness of the government control. A debate over a ban of trans fats in new york city restaurants raises the issue of how far the government should be allowed to go in protecting us from ourselves.
Should government regulate what we eat by wendy mcelroy | october 24, 2006 also published in ifeministscom on oct 30, the new york city board of health will hold a public meeting on whether to implement a near-total ban on the use of trans fats by new york city restaurants. While the government should not be responsible, it could, however, help to discourage obesity by slapping a heavy tax on sugar, thereby pushing up prices of foodstuffs laden with huge amounts of sugar. In fact, in many ways, government control today is already far too expansive and now, they want to control what we eat, how much junk food we have access to, and are spending millions of tax dollars trying to limit portion sizes, salt, transfats and other nutritional aspects of the food we eat. Should the government really have a say in our diet absolutely not we should be in control of our body and choose what we like shouldn't we take responsibility for our actions if the government were to get involved in our diets, who can say where they will stop at are they going to tell us. In the meanwhile, here are some more food items that federal and state governments have either banned or restricted due to health concerns, to preserve an animal species, or in response to inhumane preparation methods.
If the government is buying the food, they should have the right to control what food is bought with taxpayers money the government should also make other requirements before supplying food stamps. Uncle sam should not control what we eat in an article from, the oakland press, alan adler discusses the differences between implementing government regulations on fast food organizations and implementing government regulations for smoking in public. This control means trying to direct people to eat a certain way or expressly prohibiting or banning the consumption of certain foods government should respect the voluntary choices made by. The government has made it clear that the nation's growing girth is a cause for concern but should they take more action to tackle the problem telegraphcouk readers have their say.
The government should subsidize healthy foods in order to encourage people to eat them in addition, fast food restaurants should be required to provide healthy options for people who still want. In the midst of the political hullabaloo, we set out to see what our readers thoughts about the proposed ban, as well as whether the government has the right to control portion sizes (read more. In my opinion the government should only have as much control as necessary to preserve human life and liberty the government should be there to prevent people's rights from being removed it should not be there to take from some to give to others and it should not serve as a tool to grant some people power at the expense of others. If we let the government control what we eat we'll just be back in the 1700's when they put taxes on our stuff so they'll only be worsening america because that's only going to encourage that we eat junk food so that's why i say no.
We as citizens do have to right to choose what we eat, but when we do choose we should have to capability and knowledge to be able to choose beneficial meals that will only increase of well being having chips, soda, and sweets are certainly not a crime but they government can certainly make it less available and more expensive then fruit, milk. The primary focus of the federal school meal programs should be meeting students' needs but for that to happen, there must be recognition that parents — not the first lady or congress. The great government takeover it's not up to the government to choose consumer behavior and lead people to eat a certain way - even if the government is right we've been trying to. Ecores is happy to invite you to its first ecores chair by prof rachel griffith (institute for fiscal studies and manchester university), on the topic should governments control what we eat.